• About
    • Soft censorship practices
    • Recommendations
    • Contact
  • Cases
    • Interactive map
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • The Americas
  • Reports
    • 2015 Update Reports
    • Global Review
    • Country Reports
  • WAN-IFRA

India

Audience and readership measuring is flawed in India

Posted on October 20, 2015 Leave a Comment

Audience and readership measuring is flawed in India, according to the article “Boom time for media but witha growing ethical deficit”, by A.S. Panneerselvan. The unavailability of reliable data impedes, among others, the fair allocation of government advertising and undermines people’s quest for truth.

The Indian readership survey is supposed to give everyone — public, media and business interests alike — the demographic details of press readership and circulation. But the latest Indian Readership Survey (IRS) by the Media Research Users Council (MRUC) and Readership Studies Council of India (RSCI) has “absurd figures which defy logic and reason”, says Panneerselvan.

The Television Rating Point (TRP), which is supposed to track the programmes that are most popular, has failed to gain the broadcast industry’s confidence. Prannoy Roy, the Chairman of broadcasting NDTV group, said: “Virtually every city in India has a ratings consultant who, for a relatively small fee, will ensure higher ratings for any channel.” Reportedly, ratings consultants get to know where the people-meters that measure viewership are located, visit the people-meter homes, give the family a brand new 60-inch plasma television and tell them: “Watch whatever you like on this lovely big television but on the television attached to the people-meter you must only watch such-and-such channels (…) The family also gets an additional reward at the end of the year if they have done what they were asked to do efficiently”.

Statisticians and other number crunchers are expected to follow a rigorous methodology to provide reliable data on the media’s reach. But if their projections are deeply flawed, it severely undermines people’s quest for the truth.

 

Source: A.S. Panneerselvan (2015) “India: boom-time for media but with a growing ethical deficit” in Aidan White (ed.) Untold Stories. How Corruption and Conflicts of Interests Stalk the Newsroom. Ethical Jornalism Network. http://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/assets/docs/220/136/92a87dc-d968188.pdf

 

 

 

Posted in: Advertising, Asia, Cases, Other Administrative Pressures | Tagged: Advertising, India, Other administrative pressures

"Official 'soft censorship' describes an array of official actions intended to influence media output, short of legal or extra-legal bans, direct censorship of specific content, or physical attacks on media outlets or media practitioners."

SC Map

Tags

Advertising Africa Asia Audits Bolivia Bribery Ecuador Euope Europe General Imports India Interviews Licenses Other administrative pressures Paid Paid "News" Subsidies Taxes The Americas Turkey

#SoftCensorship

  • 
  • 
#softcensorship Tweets

Partners

Learn about other WAN-IFRA projects

Media Development micro-site

Copyright © 2021 WAN-IFRA.

Theme by ThemeHall.